K7P - t he Inner Scoop of t he Poop & Pee Dog Copyright Violation Ceremony

- the Sacred Scribe of the Church of the SubGenius: Rev. Ivan Stang; Mark Mothersbaugh; Rev. Lizard; Pink Boyz; Drz. 4 "Bob"; Saint Byron Werner; [Michael Peppe?;] Relax Radio; RAN of NAR; Rev. Mark Harp & Chris Demstead;tENTATIVELY, a cONVENIENCE..

(w/ 31pp booklet) - $8.00 - (90 minutes)

 

From: "Factsheet Five" #44 - August '91 - us@

THE INNER SCOOP OF THE POOP AND PEE DOG COPYRIGHT VIOLATION CEREMONY A package of a 90 minute tape and a 28 page booklet. The tape is a collection of SubGenius goodies like the "Bob" loves you samples from Stang and Mothersbaugh, the Creature of the Busy Signal, Drz for "Bob", radio clips from WJHU and much more. The entertaining booklet lets you in on what really happened (and what people say happened) at the railroad tunnel ceremony years ago. (T/EH)

 

to V.C. home page - to S.P.C.S.M.E.F home page - to N.A.A.M.C.P. home page

to A Mere Outline for One Aspect of a Book on Mystery Catalysts, Guerrilla Playfare, booed usic, Mad Scientist Didactions, Acts of As-Beenism, So-Called Whatevers, Psychopathfinding, Uncerts, Air Dressing, Practicing Promotextuality, Imp Activism, etc..

to Widémouth Tapes home page - to Widémouth Tapes Catalog - to Usic Essays home page

Last Updated:

The reviews are not necessarily copied verbatim from the original. Usually, small apparent typos are corrected & obsolete addresses are removed. In some cases, I may choose to leave misspellings, misinformation, etc intact to demonstrate how sloppy the reviewer is. Of course, there may be times when the original packaging was confusing (deliberately or otherwise) which may effect the reviewer's comprehension. The more recent the tapes are, the less likely this is to be the case. Most of the recent tapes provide fairly extensive liner notes. In some cases, reviewers whose native language isn't English may be writing in English anyway for the sake of 'internationalizing' their reviews. Obviously, this may lead to what strikes native English speakers as 'bad' English. Hopefully, equally obviously, this should not be interpreted as a lack of intelligence in the writing. Editorial notes may be inserted into the reviews in [brackets]. In many instances, I (tENTATIVELY, a cONVENIENCE) replied to reviews that I disagreed with strongly. These replies are included here. In some cases, I may add additional retrospective comments.