1976. I'm thinking that.. by tentatively, a convenience
In my attempts to clarify my personal philosophy & how it might serve as a base for developing my personal language use I explored both increased ambiguity & attempts at accurate analysis. Both were (& still are) useful. I had already developed a way of writing that began with an open quotation mark (") followed by the Latin abbreviation for "for example" (eg) followed by the main body of the text ended by a question mark (?) followed by a closed quotation mark ("). The idea was to indicate that language is intrinsically a quote in the sense that the language used is not personal to the user, that the main body of the text is just an example of a possibility & not definitive, & that the main body of the text is more of a question than it is an answer. For a text that introduces this approach read this: 1976. language . Here, I try to analyze as directly as I can what I'm trying to do. Note that the typewriter paper gradually torqued as the paper went through it - causing the text to slant downward toward the right. This is not intentional on my part & shouldn't be ascribed any meaning other than what I just explained.
back to Writing index
idioideo at verizon dot net
to the tENTATIVELY, a cONVENIENCE movie-making "Press: Criticism, Interviews, Reviews" home-page
to the "tENTATIVELY, a cONVENIENCE - Sprocket Scientist" home-page
to the "FLICKER" home-page for the alternative cinematic experience
to find out more about why the S.P.C.S.M.E.F. (Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Sea Monkeys by Experimental Filmmakers) is so important
for info on tENTATIVELY, a cONVENIENCE's tape/CD publishing label: WIdémoUTH
to see an underdeveloped site re the N.A.A.M.C.P. (National Association for the Advancement of Multi-Colored Peoples)